Numerous trials (CATT trial, IVAN trial, GEFAL, MANTA, LUCAS) conducted worldwide have shown Bevacizumab injection in the eye to be non-inferior to Ranibizumab injection in the eye in terms of efficacy and safety in AMD. Bevacizumab on the other hand has the advantage of significantly reducing the cost of therapy. However, intravitreal bavacizumab injection has not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the use in the eye is hence 'off label'. All patients need to be clearly informed when taking written consent for intraocular bevacizumab.
Uveitis : Controlled clinical studies of patients with uveitis demonstrated that LOTEMAX (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension) was less effective than prednisolone acetate 1%. Overall, 72% of patients treated with LOTEMAX (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension) experienced resolution of anterior chamber cell by day 28, compared to 87% of patients treated with 1% prednisolone acetate. The incidence of patients with clinically significant increases in IOP ( ≥ 10 mmHg) was 1% with LOTEMAX (loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension) and 6% with prednisolone acetate 1%.